Human Rights in Cuba

Time To Change

Waiting for help
Waiting for help

Just how do Americans see Cuba?
Nothing about U.S. relations with Cuba is simple. But a recent Atlantic
Council poll examined none of the nuances.
By Robyn J. Wapner
March 6, 2014

The Washington-based think tank Atlantic Council released a poll last
month that has been touted by many as marking an unprecedented shift in
support for a change in U.S. policy toward Cuba. Media outlets,
including the L.A. Times, jumped on the bandwagon, citing the poll as
evidence that Americans are now eager for engagement. But a closer look
shows that many of the most consequential results of the poll are based
on push-polling tactics.

Push polling is the craft of designing survey questions to shape and
influence the results. In this case, several questions in the Atlantic
Council Cuba poll appear to “push” respondents toward assuming a
position against current U.S. policy.

Nothing about U.S. relations with Cuba is simple. The many facets of our
estrangement span such a spectrum of interests and time that few have a
clear understanding of the intricate web of current policy.

For example, despite the absence of official diplomatic relations, Cuba
remains a major component of U.S. foreign policy. Unbeknown to many,
official high-level meetings continue to take place between our two
countries. Just last month, U.S. and Cuban officials met in Havana for
semiannual migration talks. In addition, despite a supposed ,
Cuba has purchased billions of dollars in products from the United
States since 2001. And there are numerous ways Americans can get to
Cuba. Just ask Beyonce and Jay-Z.

Granted, not everything is great.

A few weeks ago, United Nations experts reportedly concluded that a
shipment of Cuban weapons to North Korea last summer violated U.N.
sanctions. Since the 2001 arrest of Ana Belen Montes (a former Defense
Intelligence Agency analyst who spied for Cuba for 16 years), there have
been multiple cases of additional Cuban espionage in the U.S. As
recently as 2009, Walter and Gwendolyn Myers (a retired State Department
employee and his wife) were for spying for Cuba for three decades.

Cuba has also shot down aircraft and killed American citizens in the
past; it is reportedly training armed groups in ; and it has
been holding U.S. citizen Alan for more than four years
because he was providing communications equipment to Cuba’s
Jewish community.

The Atlantic Council’s survey examined none of these nuances. It barely
got beyond simple talking points. For example, the question that
garnered the most touted finding read:

“As you may know, since 1961 the United States has had no diplomatic
relations with Cuba and restricts trade and with Cuba for the
vast majority of American citizens and businesses. Would you favor or
oppose normalizing U.S. relations with Cuba / the U.S. engaging more
directly with Cuba?”

And if a respondent answered no, he or she was subjected to this follow-up:

“The United States has formal relations or at least talks and negotiates
with many countries that are not friendly to us, have poor
records, or both, including , Russia and Iran. Yet we continue NOT
to have any relations or discussions with Cuba. Knowing this, let me ask
you again, do you favor or oppose normalizing U.S. relations with Cuba /
the U.S. engaging more directly with Cuba?”

Another question asked whether Cuba deserves to be a designated state
sponsor of terrorism. Those who said yes were prompted with this:

“Thousands of Al Qaeda terrorists are in Sudan or Syria, and Iran has
been aggressively building its nuclear program. Despite human rights
abuses, Cuba poses none of the active dangers to the United States and
our security that these other countries possess. Thinking again, does
Cuba pose the same threat as Sudan, Syria and Iran, and thus belong on
the state-sponsored terrorism list?”

Ask a question enough different ways with enough leading statements and
pollsters are bound to get the answer they want.

Further, while the poll asked respondents about ways U.S. policy toward
Cuba could be changed, none of the options provided the opportunity to
demonstrate support for components of current U.S. policy.

One of the takeaways promoted by the Atlantic Council was that “more
than 6 in 10 people want all economic restrictions lifted.” But
respondents were never actually asked about the total lifting of
economic restrictions, or about current U.S. law, which does provide for
the conditional removal of sanctions.

To be fair, the highly complex nature of U.S. policy toward Cuba makes
any poll seeking to gauge public perception difficult to pull off.
However, rather than acknowledging the complexity of U.S.-Cuba
relations, this poll centered on questions that made it seem the choice
was an all-or-nothing proposition. This is simply not the case.

The February poll is one survey, one snapshot of public opinion, and one
that appears to have had an agenda. By contrast, millions of Americans
have voted for and elected congressional representatives who have shaped
and debated U.S. policy toward Cuba for more than five decades. Hundreds
of thousands of Floridians continue to vote election after election for
representatives who espouse a nuanced yet sanctions-focused policy.

The only way we will know when Americans really want a change in policy
toward Cuba is once they force that change through their representatives
in Congress.

Robyn J. Wapner is a former senior policy advisor to the House of
Representatives’ Committee on Foreign Affairs. She is a Western
Hemisphere expert with the Poblete Analysis Group.

Source: Just how do Americans see Cuba? – –,0,900325.story#axzz2vBKjhghp

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Zapata lives
Zapata lives
No place to live
No place to live