Human Rights in Cuba

Time To Change

Calendar
Waiting for help
Waiting for help

Why Castro’s demand for reparations from US could backfire
Cuban President Raúl Castro demanded this week that the United States
pay hundreds of millions of dollars in economic reparations for damages
caused by the US on Cuba. But Cuban-Americans have claims on
Cuba, too.
By Howard LaFranchi, Staff writer JANUARY 29, 2015

WASHINGTON — Cuban President Raúl Castro had a surprise for the Obama
administration when he issued a new and considerably tougher set of
demands this week for reaching normalized relations with the United States.

Return of the Guantánamo Bay naval base to Cuban sovereignty was perhaps
the most stop-and-take-notice condition Mr. Castro set in a speech
Wednesday. But it was the brother of ’s demand concerning
reparations that could end up stirring the bitterest pot and posing the
highest obstacle to normalization.

Castro said United States payment of hundreds of millions of dollars in
economic reparations for damages caused by the five-decade-old embargo,
and indeed a lifting of the embargo Cuba considers a “blockade,” would
also have to take place before the two adversaries can renew relations
that were severed soon after the Cuban revolution of 1959.

But Castro’s reparation demands also carry a risk. That’s because they
virtually guarantee reawakening the sensitive issue of the estimated
billions of dollars in reparations that US citizens, American
businesses, and Cuban-Americans claim are owed for properties and
businesses seized from them in the revolution.

The eye-catching demands, delivered in a speech to a Latin American
summit in Costa Rica, seemed aimed in part at burnishing Cuba’s image as
a tough adversary of Yankee imperialism even as bilateral talks on
reestablishing diplomatic ties proceed.

In a further sign of the momentum behind President Obama’s opening to
Cuba, a bipartisan group of senators on Thursday introduced legislation
to lift the ban on Americans going to Cuba. It was the first
piece of legislation to be introduced in the wake of Mr. Obama’s
executive orders easing trade and travel restrictions with Cuba.

The tough stance Castro assumed appears aimed at calming concerns – both
domestically among Communist Party stalwarts, and among Cuba’s leftist
supporters throughout Latin America – that the US-Cuba rapprochement
announced in December might suggest Cuba was going soft on its longtime foe.

The speech followed on the heels of Fidel Castro’s first pronouncement
on the new direction in bilateral relations. In a letter published
Monday, the former leader signaled his cautious approval by saying he
would “always defend cooperation and friendship with all the people of
the world, including with our political adversaries.”

He also said that while “I don’t trust the policy of the United States
… this does not mean I reject a peaceful solution to conflicts.”

But Raúl Castro’s demand for US reparations for the economic embargo
seemed likely to stir a pot that has never stopped simmering since 1960.

In 1961 the US Commerce Department put a price tag of $1.8 billion on
the Cuban property seized without compensation from Americans, who
ranged from small vacation homeowners to giant corporations like
Coca-Cola, Texaco, and Freeport-McMoRan. Today, conservative estimates
place the value of the 6,000 property claims at $7 billion.

Further complicating the compensation issue are the thousands of cases
of Cubans who saw their homes and businesses seized by the Cuban state
when they fled the revolution, largely for Miami.

Indeed a recurring fear among Cuban families that were given a house as
seized residential properties were redistributed following the
revolution is that the day will come when the Miami Cubans will return
to claim their property.

In the weeks since Obama and Raúl Castro announced their intentions to
move toward normalized relations, much has been made of the fact that it
would take an act of Congress to lift the trade embargo. But the same US
law that codifies the embargo, the Helms-Burton Act of 1996, also
requires compensation for confiscated properties before the trade
embargo can be lifted.

Resolving Americans’ property compensation demands won’t be any easier
than meeting Cuba’s condition that it be paid reparations for the
economic impact and “human toll” of the trade embargo – a cost Cuban
authorities last year estimated at $1.1 trillion.

But in his speech Castro did seem to allow himself an out for advancing
relations even if the prickliest bilateral issues are left unresolved.

The new course the two old adversaries have embarked on might lead to
renewed diplomatic relations at some point in the near term, Castro
said. But normal ties and exchange between the two countries won’t be
possible, he added, until all the complicated issues of six decades of
rancor and distrust have been addressed.

Source: Why Castro’s demand for reparations from US could backfire
(+video) – CSMonitor.com –
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Foreign-Policy/2015/0129/Why-Castro-s-demand-for-reparations-from-US-could-backfire-video

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Zapata lives
Zapata lives
No place to live
No place to live