Human Rights in Cuba

Time To Change

Calendar
December 2016
M T W T F S S
« Nov   Jan »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
Waiting for help
Waiting for help

Looking at Cuba Right Now
PEDRO CAMPOS | La Habana | 22 de Diciembre de 2016 – 12:27 CET.

In Cuba, in the name of socialism, the revolution and the
workers, “Fidelism” placed the under state control, along with
all large, medium and small properties, whether Cuban or foreign-owned,
on which it organized wage-based production for the state, and seized
political power for a minority.

The triumphant revolution of 1959, which never completed its democratic
cycle, and never veered towards authentic socialism, ended up yielding a
totalitarian, anti-democratic system characterized by monopolistic state
administration so unproductive that it destroyed the economic bases of
Cuban society, aggravated its , and problems, and
systematically and flagrantly violated every civil, political and
economic rights of the Cuban people, all justified by invocations of the
“defense of the revolution.”

Thousands of dissidents died or were shot or assassinated during the
civil war that followed 1959, due to all those abuses, and hundreds of
thousands were jailed and condemned to long sentences.

Today the opposition employs peaceful and democratic methods, but it is
openly subjugated. Socialist dissidence and alternative thought is also
persecuted. Everyone is prevented from freely expressing themselves, or
forming legal organizations, and their participation in electoral
processes is hampered, as these are manipulated by the Party-Government.
And, thus, thousands of Cubans flee the country any way they can,
risking their lives on seas and in forests, while those who hold power
seek to keep their grip on it forever, and are not even capable of
calling upon the nation to engage in a constructive dialogue.

According to their own statements, the revolution’s advances were
and medical care for all, but what they were after was a
guarantee of a trained, healthy and dispossessed workforce that could be
exploited by the state. And let it be made clear that public medicine as
a widespread phenomenon has always has faced difficulties, with
systematic epidemics that have demanded major ad hoc efforts. Since the
fall of the USSR and the “socialist camp” facilities for the
people have been racked by deficient medical equipment and food
supplies, while the political/military hierarchy enjoys hospitals with
high levels of technology and other more favorable conditions.

The “anti-imperialist confrontation with the U.S.A.,” with Cuba playing
the role of the victim, and “proletarian internationalism,” which
concealed an attempt to export “the revolution,” carried out through
incursions into other countries, and medical and educational “aid” to
other peoples, most of it charged for, were Cuba’s international letters
of presentation in search of international support and prestige, at an
enormous cost to Cuban workers, professionals and soldiers.

Now, as the populist-nationalist-statist wave in Latin America, set in
motion with the arrival of Chávez to power in , ebbs as a
result of its errors and excesses, and as the state model demonstrates
its inefficiency, comes the death of , orphaning the
bureaucratic model crafted by and for him. Under such circumstances,
aiming to defend the status quo, without any changes, may prove
counterproductive for the members of the military, who have inherited
their centralized political and economic power, but not the influence or
magnetism of the leader at the national and international level to
maintain it.

Hence, reform measures that seek to refine the state’s model for
wage-based exploitation, with collaboration by major foreign capital,
instead of expanding popular support, may definitively erode it, if they
involve nothing but the opening of limited private and cooperative
economic spaces that serve only to prop up a larger state-based plan,
maintain a high level of exploitation, appropriate the wages of foreign
technicians and professionals abroad, or foreigners in the country,
control hiring, force wage-earners to work for the state with low pay so
that they cannot become independent or create their own companies, and
legally hinder private professional activities and the creation of
companies and independent cooperatives.

These obstructions are openly detrimental to the interests of the
people, workers and Cuban entrepreneurs, who they will no longer will be
able to keep suppressing, because Cuba and the world have changed.

If, along with this, the military in power continues to refuse to make
changes to the political system, based on a single party, and the legal
mechanisms that make possible the formation and development of political
alternatives, the challenging panorama we will be facing in the short
term can be appreciated.

Under these circumstances, the governments of other countries interested
in benefitting their economic interests in their relations with the
Cuban government, and the international movements and parties considered
“socialist and of the left,” if they do not also recognize the negative
consequences of Fidelismo’s state-based, centralized and repressive
policies on workers, and the rights of the Cuban people, and if they do
not demand that the Government of the Island respect international rules
at all forums and meetings, will only be making everything more
difficult for and social justice in Cuba, thwarted in the name
of a non-existent socialism.

This combination of interests and visions lead the Cuban people to feel
isolated in their fight for a more just society. This is the price paid
for allegiance to a caudillo who managed to dupe the majority, and our
inability as a people to identify our interests and draw together
prodemocracy forces for effective change.

Many believe that the international policies of isolation and commercial
and financial blockades have actually benefitted the bureaucracy in
power by allowing it to portray itself as an international victim, and
to justify its economic disasters and repressive policies, without them
having affected the elite’s standard of living. Others, on other hand,
think that without strong international pressure for political and
economic isolation, to drown the statist system, profound changes will
not be possible in the country. Attitudes toward this phenomenon, which
does not depend on us, have divided dissenting political forces.

For everyone’s sake, well-meaning Cubans, from the Island and off it,
regardless of their political philosophies, should set aside their
differences, as we all ought to seek common ground on which to build the
nation, based on a recognition of our diversity and respect for others,
so that we can elevate it, through democracy, to the political and
social level for which Cubans have been struggling for two centuries
now, with everyone, and for everyone’s sake.

Otherwise, our fate will continue to depend on some other giant that
backs the dominant group in the power: the one that is there, or the one
that succeeds it, because a divided nation will always be a victim of
international hegemonies.

Source: Looking at Cuba Right Now | Diario de Cuba –
www.diariodecuba.com/cuba/1482406075_27616.html

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Zapata lives
Zapata lives
No place to live
No place to live