Could 1 million more Cubans be deemed ineligible for remittances?
BY MIMI WHITEFIELD
William LeoGrande, an American University professor who specializes in
U.S.-Cuba relations, says it appears there might be a “poison pill” in
President Donald Trump’s new Cuba policy that potentially could cut off
remittances to more than 1 million Cubans.
The memorandum on strengthening Cuba policy that Trump signed last week
in Miami specifically states that regulatory changes shall not prohibit
“sending, processing or receiving authorized remittances” — the money
that’s sent to family members and friends in Cuba.
Currently remittances can be sent to almost anyone on the island — with
the exception of members of the Council of Ministers, which includes the
president, first vice president, seven first vice presidents, ministers
and a few other top officials, and high-ranking military officials.
But the Trump memo greatly expands the definition of so-called
It includes not only ministers, vice ministers and members of the
Council of State and Council of Ministers but also members and employees
of the National Assembly of People’s Power — Cuba’s parliament;
provincial assembly members; local heads of Committees for the Defense
of the Revolution; directors general, sub-directors and higher officers
of all Cuban ministries and state agencies; employees of the Ministry of
the Interior and the Ministry of Defense; and members and employees of
Cuba’s Supreme Court.
The memo also lists secretaries and first secretaries of the
Confederation of Labor of Cuba and top editors of all state-run media
outlets as prohibited officials.
Such a sweeping category could potentially include a quarter of Cuba’s
labor force, LeoGrande said. “It’s literally a million people if you
count everyone who works for the military and GAESA that could have
their remittances cut off,” he said.
GAESA (Grupo de Administración Empresarial) is a Cuban military
conglomerate that controls a broad swath of the Cuban economy, including
the Gaviota Tourism Group. One of the cornerstones of Trump’s new Cuba
policy is channeling U.S. money and businesses away from GAESA and
instead encouraging Americans and U.S. companies to develop economic
ties with small private business people in Cuba.
But widening the prohibition on who can receive remittances could
potentially hurt many Cuban families — those Trump has said he wants to
support with his new policy, LeoGrande said. Many Cubans are dependent
on money sent from friends and relatives abroad because state salaries
are so low. An estimated $3 billion in remittances is sent to the island
Among the questions, which may by clarified when regulations on the new
Cuba policy are written, is how literally to take the definition of all
employees of the Ministry of Defense.
All Cuban males must complete compulsory military service. “Does this
mean an active duty private is an employee of the Ministry of Defense,
and therefore a prohibited person?” asked Robert Muse, a Washington
lawyer. “There still has to be more definition of what this means.”
Also in question is whether a person who is a clerk or low-level
employee at an enterprise run by GAESA would be considered an employee
of the Ministry of Defense.
Trying to sort out such definitions about who is eligible to receive
remittances could potentially become a real headache for money transfer
companies, Muse said.
In response to a query, Western Union, which has provided money transfer
services to Cuba from the United States since 1999 and more recently
began to handle remittances from other parts of the world to Cuba, said:
“Western Union does not believe the changes are intended to impact the
sending of authorized remittances to Cuba.”
Said LeoGrande: “There are a number of things that need to be clarified.
The [memorandum] is so ambiguous in places.”
Cuba watchers also point to a section of Trump’s memorandum that
instructs the State Department to identify “entities or sub-entities”
under the control or acting on behalf of the Cuban “military,
intelligence or security services or personnel” and publish a list of
those with which “direct financial transactions” would
disproportionately benefit them “at the expense of the Cuban people or
private enterprise in Cuba.”
Some analysts have zeroed in on the word direct in the memorandum.
Previous OFAC directives usually refer to direct and indirect financial
“Does this mean you can’t go and book at a Gaviota hotel, but you can
give a Spanish tour company money and they can get you a room at the
Saratoga?” Muse asked. (The Hotel Saratoga is operated under the
umbrella of Habaguanex, which was recently transferred to the military.)
FOLLOW MIMI WHITEFIELD ON TWITTER: @HERALDMIMI
Source: American University professor says remittances to Cuba may be in
jeopardy | Miami Herald –